Crowley argues with Goldblog: I agree that the nature of the regime matters. But I think it matters far less than the outcome of Iran's nuclear program, regardless of who is in charge. An Iranian bomb is a scary prospect... Full story...
Eric Lawrence, John Sides, and Henry Farrell have put out a new study: We examine deliberation, polarization, and political participation among blog readers.
E.D. Kain mulls over a tragic and bizarre story.
Douthat defends the plan and proposes a few modifications. Ambinder notices few Republicans are willing to officially attach their names to the plan: This isn't a non-serious plan.
Matt Steinglass finds an article by Philip Jenkins: It sounds as though Mr Jenkins's focus has evolved a bit over the past few years; when he wrote this article in the New Republic, he wasn't exactly saying that Western evangelicals.
A reader writes: I know you closed this thread awhile ago but after reading your recent post I feel a need to share this with you.
Ezra makes an essential point: Over the past hundred or so years, the health-care system has gone from a very small portion of our economy to about a fifth of it.
Haaretz: Rather than making conciliatory gestures toward the Palestinians and promoting an end to the conflict, the prime minister is sabotaging any chance of an agreement on the issue of Jerusalem.
A reader writes: The video of the child who says..."that means you love each other..." made me smile.
Biden gets it: “This is starting to get dangerous for us,” Biden castigated his [Israeli] interlocutors.
Matt Steinglass thinks that it is "physically impossible to learn anything substantive by watching cable TV news": Television is fundamentally a terrible medium for communicating events and public affairs.
Have your say - be the first to comment
Login